• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Adam Fletcher Adventure Series by Sara Whitford

Bestselling, family-friendly historical fiction set on the colonial North Carolina coast

  • Home
  • The Author
  • Buy the Books
  • Blog
  • Subscribe
  • Read the first book for free!

The Currency Act (1764) – The ugly, old cousin of the Federal Reserve Act

Obverse and reverse of a three pence note of paper currency issued by the Province of Pennsylvania and printed by Benjamin Franklin in 1764. (from Wikipedia)
Obverse and reverse of a three pence note of paper currency issued by the Province of Pennsylvania and printed by Benjamin Franklin in 1764. (Image from Wikipedia)

The Currency Act of 1764, along with its earlier iteration, the Currency Act of 1751 (which applied only to New England), in essence, prohibited the colonies from issuing their own paper currency as “legal tender.”

This created a problem for colonists because there were no gold or silver mines in the New World and approved currency (silver and gold coins) could only come from proper trade as regulated by Mother Britain. And since the Crown restricted trade with Dutch, French and Spanish colonies in the West Indies, that meant the only means by which the colonies could obtain approved currency was with Great Britain, herself.

According to this article, “Triangular Trade, coupled with the policy of Mercantilism, provided a ‘favorable balance of trade’ for Great Britain but an ‘imbalance of trade’ in the colonies resulting in a massive trade deficit. The trade deficit was a direct result of the British policy of Mercantilism and its use of the Triangular trade routes. The result of this caused the colonies to suffer a chronic shortage of funds. The Currency Act threatened to destabilize the entire colonial economy of New England, the Middle Colonies and the Southern colonies.”

In other words, the Currency Act plunged the American colonies into a great, big ol’ depression.

In fact, good ol’ Benjamin Franklin, who was living in London at the time lobbied for the Currency Act to be repealed. (He wasn’t the only one, of course, but you all know who he is I assume.)

Franklin knew that choking the barely burgeoning economies of the young colonies would not only prove detrimental to the growth and future success of said colonies, but would ultimately backfire through inevitable rebellions. And that’s exactly what happened. The Currency Act, even more than the Sugar Act, started to really turn up the heat in the years ahead of the American Revolution.

In 1763, when Franklin was asked by the Bank of England why the American colonies were seeing such prosperity, he had responded:

“That is simple. In the Colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip. We issue it in proper proportion to the demands of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay no one.”

 The Currency Act of 1764 made the Colonial Script that Franklin had referred to in the earlier statement illegal.

After the Currency Act went into effect, Franklin said:

“In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed.”

One might think that after the American Revolution, this new nation would be able to avoid the types of money troubles the colonists had under the Currency Act, but it seems we never learn.

After the Revolutionary War, the fledgling United States government was up to its eyeballs in debt. That is when talk began about establishing the First Bank of the United States, which was a predecessor to the modern day Federal Reserve.

While Alexander Hamilton was the First Bank of the United States’ greatest champion, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were deeply opposed to such an institution. They believed that a central bank was unconstitutional, and that it would create an unfavorable balance relating to currency that, in this case, favored merchants and investors, at the expense of ordinary colonists, just as the Currency Act had created a detrimental imbalance in trade between the colonies and Great Britain.

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Colonial History Tagged With: AmRev, EndTheFed, RevWar

Previous Post: « The Sugar Act (1764) – Why did a law that reduced an earlier tax end up outraging colonists?
Next Post: The Stamp Act (1765) – The first direct tax on the American colonies »

Reader Interactions

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

“Whitford delivers an enjoyable tale"
—Publishers Weekly

Please note: All links to vendor sites are provided as part of an affiliate program.

Most Popular Posts

  • Basic Skills 101: Survival, or How Our Colonial Ancestors Were Smarter Than Us
  • What was Salutary Neglect and why did things get bad when it ended?
  • Coopers in Colonial America - Everything You Wanted to Know
  • 18th Century Kitchen: A look inside Hannah Glasse's 1765 cookbook
  • The Townshend Acts (1767) - Townshend's efforts to "stir the pot" worked, but he died before his laws went into effect
  • The Quartering Act (1765) - Colonists forced to foot the bill to house His Majesty's soldiers
  • The Currency Act (1764) - The ugly, old cousin of the Federal Reserve Act
  • The Sugar Act (1764) - Why did a law that reduced an earlier tax end up outraging colonists?
  • Smuggling in Colonial America: What drove good men to do it?
  • Bonus: Tour the Topsail Tavern and learn about real colonial-era taverns like the Green Dragon

About the Author

Sara Whitford's third-great-grandfather, William Morris, wrote their family lineage in a worn old copy of Robinson Crusoe. Adventure, literature, and history are in her blood. Ever since she can remember, she has been fascinated by the intriguing past of the coastal North Carolina region that has been home to her … Read more about About the Author

Copyright © 2021 Sara Whitford · All Rights Reserved

Website by Seaport Webworks.